College of Social Sciences

Faculty Evaluation for 2010

You are invited to provide as much information on your work activities and outputs in 2010 as you wish.

Please submit this completed form with the necessary attachments to the Chair of your Department by 1 April 2011.

Faculty Evaluation Principles

1. Fair evaluation of the performance of faculty is fundamental to ensuring that those who contribute are adequately rewarded. This requires a faculty evaluation that permits a differentiation of faculty performance. The information gathered from you in this faculty evaluation form will be used to the differentiation your performance from that of other faculty. It will provide the required performance evidence needed to justify any contract renewal, promotion, annual bonus, and faculty development recommendations. Before transmission to the Dean, it will reviewed by the Chair, who, in so doing, must consult with your Department’s Contract Renewal and Promotion Committee. Once evaluated, your annual performance will be discussed with you, either by the Dean or, at his/her discretion, by your Chair.

2. A guarantee of continued employment requires satisfactory annual scores on your overall performance and on each performance dimension. Those who fail to meet these minimum standards of faculty performance in any year will be required to engage in an agreed program of faculty development in those performance dimensions where their performance is less than satisfactory.

3. Annual performance bonus recommendations will be based your overall performance score relative to other College faculty (that is, your overall performance ranking in the College) and on any exceptional scores you achieve, relative to other faculty, in any one or more performance dimensions (that is, your College ranking with respect to: teaching contribution, research and scholarship, administrative contributions and management participation, and extra-curricular, recruitment, and special activities).

4. The evaluation for promotion is cumulative performance over time. The criteria and procedures are stated in the current Faculty Code of Practice.

SATISFACTORY FACULTY EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS

Lecturer

A satisfactory performance requires 60 points:

• teaching 36 points
• research Nil
• administrative contributions and management participation 12 points
• extra-curricular, recruitment, and special activities 12 points

Senior Lecturer

A satisfactory performance requires 60 points:

• teaching 36 points
• research 3 points
• administrative contributions and management participation 10 points
• extra-curricular, recruitment, and special activities 11 points

Assistant Professor

A satisfactory performance requires 60 points:

• teaching 36 points
• research 6 points
• administrative contributions and management participation 9 points
• extra-curricular, recruitment, and special activities 9 points

Associate Professor

A satisfactory performance required 60 points:

• teaching 36 points
• research 9 points
• administrative contributions and management participation 8 points
• extra-curricular, recruitment, and special activities 7 points

Full Professor

A satisfactory performance required 60 points:

• teaching 36 points
• research 12 points
• administrative contributions and management participation 6 points
• extra-curricular, recruitment, and special activities 6 points

NOTE:

Information contained in this form may be reviewed by Contract Renewal and Promotion Committees at different levels within KIMEP.

Name:

Rank:

Department:

1. Teaching contribution

Maximum Claimed Points

Student Evaluation (for the Fall, Summer and Spring Semesters)  _____         20

Please attach Course Student Evaluations.

• Scope of teaching load – 1 point for each course taught                        _____          No limit

• Intensity of teaching load – 1 point for each graduate level taught               _____          No limit

Student load – 1 point for every additional 20 students (or part thereof) in a class with over 60 students (minimum)                                _____          No limit

• Development of new courses – 8 points for each new course taught _____          No limit

Specify new course(s) code and semester taught:

• Evening and weekend office hours                                                  _____                     1

• Other teaching contributions (e.g., covering classes for ill or absent colleagues)  (1-3 points per contribution) _____        No limit

Please specify each activity and your justification for the points claimed for each one:

• OPTIONAL: Peer review of course syllabus at Departmental level-1- 3 points per course reviewed

Please attach peer-review reports                                  _____        No limit

• OPTIONAL: Peer review of teaching (for one self-nominated course)

1-5 points. Please attach peer-review report.                         _____         5

• Supervision of Master’s theses – 3 points per thesis                             _____        No limit

Please specify student’s names:

• Thesis Supervisory Panel Member – 1 point per Panel                  ____       No limit

Please specify student’s names

• Supervision of Undergraduate Research projects – 1 point per project per semester
  _____     No limit

Please specify student’s names

Teaching Contribution Score                                                                     ________

Minimum required teaching contribution score                                            36

Overall Teaching Contribution Assessment by the Chair:

Very Unsatisfactory         (-2)     Unsatisfactory           (-1)      Satisfactory (1)         Very Satisfactory (2)

Overall Teaching Contribution Assessment by the Dean:

Very Unsatisfactory          (-2)     Unsatisfactory           (-1)      Satisfactory (1)         Very Satisfactory (2)

2. Research and scholarly activities

a)

b)

c)

d)

e)

f)

g)

h)

i)

j)

k)

l)

m)

n)

Maximum Claimed Points

• Other research and scholarship contributions (e.g., journal refereeing,

conference session chairing, conference session panel membership) (1-5 points per activity)
_____    No limit

Please specify each activity and your justification for the points claimed for each one:

You must provide a self-assessment of no more than 250 words on your research and scholarly activities in relation to your submitted Research Plan for the period under review. (Please attach your Research Plan)

Research and scholarly activities score                   ________

Minimum required research and scholarship score

Lecturer                                                        Nil

• Senior Lecturer                                             3
• Assistant Professor                                        6
• Associate Professor                                        9
• Professor                                                       12
  

Overall Research and Scholarship Contribution Assessment by the Chair:

Very Unsatisfactory            (-2)     Unsatisfactory            (-1)      Satisfactory (1)           Very Satisfactory (2)

Overall Research and Scholarship Contribution Assessment by the Dean:

Very Unsatisfactory            (-2)     Unsatisfactory            (-1)      Satisfactory (1)           Very Satisfactory (2)

3. Administrative contributions and management participation

Points     Maximum

Claimed  Points

• CSS Associate Dean and Departmental Chairs _____ 18 points
• CSS Directors _____ 9 points
• Departmental student recruitment coordinator ____ 6 points
• Departmental research coordinator _____ 3 points
• Departmental internship coordinator _____ 3 points
• Work on program manuals, curriculum development of multiple courses

in minor or major sequences, coordination of multiples-section courses – 1-3 points per activity
_____ No limit

Please specify each activity and your justification for the points claimed for each one:

• Committee participation – 3 points per committee for the Chairperson, 1 points regular membership
  _____       No limit

Committee:

• Organization of special projects and academic or professional events- 1-3 points per activity
  _____    No limit

Please specify each activity and your justification for the points claimed for each one:

• Outreach to local community or national institution  – 1-3 points per activity
  _____      No limit

Please specify each activity and your justification for the points claimed for each one:

• Extra-routine contributions to Departmental, College, or KIMEP leadership, planning, goals, or analysis of issues – 1-3 points per activity.
  _____     No limit

Please specify each activity and your justification for the points claimed for each one:

Troubleshooting, crisis management, conflict resolution- 1-4 points per activity.
_____     No limit

Please specify each activity and your justification for the points claimed for each one:

• Contributions to collegiality – 1-5 points
  _____     5

Please specify each activity and your justification for the points claimed for each one:

Administrative contributions and management participation score          ________

Minimum required administrative contributions and management participationscore

• Lecturer                                                          12
• Senior Lecturer                                               10
• Assistant Professor                                          9
• Associate Professor                                          8
• Professor                                                         6

Overall Administrative Contributions and Management Participation Assessment by the Chair:

Very Unsatisfactory            (-2)     Unsatisfactory            (-1)      Satisfactory (1)           Very Satisfactory (2)

Overall Administrative Contributions and Management Participation by the Dean:

Very Unsatisfactory            (-2)     Unsatisfactory            (-1)      Satisfactory (1)           Very Satisfactory (2)

4. Extra-curricular, recruitment, and special activities

Achieved   Maximum

• Student recruitment – 1-5 points per activity
  _____ No limit

Please specify each activity and your justification for the points claimed for each one:

• Community service or outreach – 1-3 points per activity
  _____ No limit

Please specify each activity and your justification for the points claimed foreach one:

• Contribution to student activities – 1-5 points per activity
  _____     No limit

Please specify each activity and your justification for the points claimed for each one:

Extra-curricular, recruitment, and special activities score                         ________

Minimum required extra-curricular, recruitment, and special activities score:

• Lecturer                                                   12
• Senior Lecturer                                        11
• Assistant Professor                                    9
• Associate Professor                                   7
• Professor                                                   6

Overall Extra-curricular, Recruitment, and Special Activities Assessment by the Chair:

Very Unsatisfactory            (-2)     Unsatisfactory            (-1)      Satisfactory (1)           Very Satisfactory (2)

Overall Extra-curricular, Recruitment, and Special Activities Assessment by the Dean:

Very Unsatisfactory (-2)    Unsatisfactory            (-1)      Satisfactory (1)           Very Satisfactory (2)

5. Faculty Evaluation Teaching

_______ points   ____ College Ranking  _____Chair Rating _____Dean’s Rating

Research Rating

_______ points   ____ College Ranking  _____Chair Rating _____Dean’s

Administrative contribution and management participation

_______ points   ____ College Ranking  _____Chair Rating _____Dean’s Rating

Extra-curricular,recruitment, and special activities

_______ points   ____ College Ranking  _____Chair Rating _____Dean’s Rating

TOTAL POINTS ACHIEVED     _______ Points  ____ College Ranking  _____Chair Rating _____Dean’s Rating

DEAN’S/CHAIR’S FACULTY DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONFACULTY APPRAISEL INTERVIEW DATE:
RESPONSE OF DEAN’S/CHAIR’S FACULTY DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Dean’s /Chair’s Signature       ______________________________

Date

Faculty’s Signature                 ______________________________

Date

Attachments:

• Student teaching evaluations for all courses taught over the evaluation period.
• Research Plan covering the appraisal period.
• Any peer-review of syllabus and/or teaching.
• Evidence of acceptance and/or submission of manuscripts for publication.
• Full CV

Please submit this completed form with the necessary attachments to the Chair of your Department by 1 March 2011.

A course syllabus can be peer-evaluated only once every four years.

A peer teaching review must be of a different course each year.

The Chair must seek advice on annual teaching performance of any faculty from the Department Contract Renewal and Promotion Committee.

Any publication accepted for publication but not published during the evaluation period can be claimed either in this evaluation period or in the evaluation period during which it is published. It can, however, be claimed only once. Evidence of acceptance is required and must be attached.

Maximum points claimed only if paper subsequently submitted to an international peer-review journal. Evidence of submission is required and must be attached.

Maximum points claimed only if paper subsequently submitted to an international peer-review journal. Evidence of submission is required and must be attached.

A work-in-progress must be justified in terms of: (1) a funded multi-year research project; or (2) a book contract (points for work-in-progress cannot cumulatively exceed the maximum points assigned to the final publication, and the points claimed for the final publication cannot exceed the maximum points assigned to the final publication).

This is an open-ended category but any outputs claimed must be verifiable and in a form that permits the embodied quality of research and scholarship involved to be judged by peer-review.

The Chair must seek advice on annual research and scholarship performance of any faculty from the Department Contract Renewal and Promotion Committee.

The Chair must seek advice on annual research and scholarship performance of any faculty from the departmental Contract Renewal and Promotion Committee.

The Chair must seek advice on extra-curricular, recruitment, and special activities performance of any faculty from the Department Contract Renewal and Promotion Committee.